Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs. Forerunner 165 - Which Mid-Range Smartwatch is Perfect for You?

When choosing a mid-range Garmin smartwatch, Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165 is one of the most common comparisons people struggle with. The two watches sit at a similar price point, both feature AMOLED displays, and are designed for users who want serious fitness tracking without jumping into Garmin’s high-end models. On paper, they look surprisingly close — which makes deciding which one is actually better for you harder than it should be.

The confusion usually comes down to focus. The Vivoactive 6 leans more toward everyday wear and general fitness, while the Forerunner 165 is clearly built with running and structured training in mind. When you only scan the spec sheets, these differences aren’t always obvious, and that’s exactly why many buyers end up stuck, unsure whether they’re paying for features they won’t use or missing ones they actually need.

If you’re new to Garmin, comparing Vivoactive and Forerunner models for the first time, or simply trying to decide whether the Garmin Vivoactive 6 or Forerunner 165 is worth buying, this comparison is for you. It’s also ideal for anyone who wants a capable sports watch without overspending on advanced tools designed for elite athletes.

Instead of repeating raw specifications, this guide breaks down the real-world differences between the Garmin Vivoactive 6 and Forerunner 165, focusing on daily wear, fitness and running performance, smart features, and long-term usability. By the end, you’ll have a clear answer to which watch fits your lifestyle and training goals — not just which one looks better on a comparison chart.

For more information, you can also check the latest review and comparison articles about Vivoactive 6 below:

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Vivoactive 5

Garmin Venu 4 vs Garmin Vivoactive 6 

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Garmin Forerunner 265

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Galaxy Watch 8 Classic

Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Garmin Venu 3

Quick Verdict - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs. Forerunner 165

• Choose the Garmin Vivoactive 6 if you want one watch that works seamlessly for daily wear, gym workouts, and general fitness, with a stronger focus on lifestyle features rather than structured training.
• Choose the Garmin Forerunner 165 if running is your main priority, and you value physical buttons, clearer workout control, and a more training-focused experience over everyday smartwatch features.
• If you’re new to Garmin or unsure about your long-term training goals, the Vivoactive 6 is the safer all-round option that won’t feel overwhelming or overly specialized.
• If you already follow running plans or train with purpose, the Forerunner 165 delivers a more focused toolset that supports consistency and progression.

Key Specs Comparison - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs. Forerunner 165

Design & Wearing Experience - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs. Forerunner 165

When it comes to comfort and usability, the Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165 comparison shows clear differences in design and wearing experience.

The Vivoactive 6 leans toward a modern smartwatch style with a slim, minimalist design and a responsive touchscreen paired with just two physical buttons. The top button has been redesigned for a lighter, smoother feel, making it easy to adjust settings or check notifications quickly. It’s ideal for everyday wear, the gym, or light runs, offering a polished, stylish look that blends seamlessly with daily outfits. The display is bright and colorful with strong scratch resistance, keeping it clear even after regular use.

The Forerunner 165 emphasizes a sport-focused design, retaining the classic five-button layout (three on one side, two on the other), allowing easy operation even while wearing gloves or with sweaty hands, without relying on touchscreen gestures. Its lightweight body ensures comfort during long runs, rides, or even overnight wear. While slightly thicker than the Vivoactive 6, it remains light and practical, and the touchscreen is equally clear and responsive during workouts.

Verdict for comfort and usability:

• If you prioritize a stylish, modern smartwatch design with comfortable daily wear and easy touchscreen interaction, the Vivoactive 6 is the better choice.
• If you value training-oriented functionality, effortless operation during workouts, and performance in sweaty or gloved conditions, the Forerunner 165 is the more suitable option.

Display & Build Quality - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

When comparing Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165, display quality and durability are key factors for everyday and sports use.

Both watches feature a 1.2-inch AMOLED display with vibrant colors and sharp text, making them easily readable indoors, under bright sunlight, or at night. The touchscreen is responsive, menu navigation is smooth, and the always-on display allows quick glances at stats during workouts or daily activities.

The main differences lie in screen protection and materials:

• Vivoactive 6 uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3, offering stronger scratch resistance and better durability for outdoor activities or occasional bumps.
• Forerunner 165 features chemically strengthened glass, slightly less hard, but more than sufficient for everyday use, gym sessions, swimming, and light outdoor activities.

During exercise, the Forerunner 165 screen remains clear and readable, and combined with its five physical buttons, it allows easy operation even with gloves or sweaty hands. Meanwhile, the Vivoactive 6 leans more toward daily wear and light workouts, with simpler controls and a smoother touchscreen experience.

Both watches are 5 ATM water-resistant, suitable for swimming, showers, or accidental splashes. They also support interchangeable bands, letting you adjust style or functionality for different activities. Both models are lightweight (36–39 g) and moderately thick, ensuring comfortable all-day wear.

Verdict for display & durability:

• If you prioritize screen durability and occasional outdoor bumps, the Vivoactive 6 is the more attractive choice.
• If your focus is daily training, running, or fitness activities without extreme outdoor conditions, the Forerunner 165 display is fully adequate, and the button-based operation enhances usability during workouts.

Health Tracking Differences - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

When comparing Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165 in terms of health tracking, both watches offer similar basic functions, but there are clear differences that matter depending on your lifestyle and training needs.

Heart Rate Monitoring

• Vivoactive 6: Equipped with the 4th-generation heart rate sensor, it supports real-time HR monitoring and HRV (heart rate variability) analysis, reflecting autonomic nervous system status to help track recovery and stress levels.
• Forerunner 165: Also provides accurate heart rate monitoring but lacks HRV analysis, offering mainly basic heart rate data.
• Who it matters for: If you care about training intensity, recovery, and stress management, Vivoactive 6 adds real value. For users who only want basic heart rate reference, Forerunner 165 is sufficient.

Sleep Monitoring

• Vivoactive 6: Automatically detects light, deep, and REM sleep stages, provides sleep quality scores and recovery assessments, and features a smart alarm to wake you gently during light sleep.
• Forerunner 165: Tracks total sleep duration and rough quality, but lacks detailed stage analysis and smart alarm functionality.
• Who it matters for: Users focused on daily health and recovery quality will benefit more from Vivoactive 6; casual sleepers may find Forerunner 165 adequate.

Stress Tracking

• Vivoactive 6: Uses HRV and algorithms to provide stress scores and guidance, helping users understand and manage daily stress levels.
• Forerunner 165: Some models support stress monitoring, but depth and accuracy are limited.
• Who it matters for: If managing daily stress is important, Vivoactive 6 is the better choice; otherwise, the difference may be negligible.

Body Battery

• Vivoactive 6: Integrates sleep, activity, and heart rate data to calculate real-time energy reserves, helping plan workouts and rest efficiently.
• Forerunner 165: Supports the function in a basic form, but with less detailed data.
• Who it matters for: Users who want optimized training or detailed health management benefit from Vivoactive 6; casual users may not notice the difference.

Female Health Tracking

• Vivoactive 6: Supports menstrual cycle and pregnancy tracking, offering more personalized insights.
• Forerunner 165: Also offers female health tracking but with less detail and personalization.
• Who it matters for: Women who need detailed cycle or pregnancy tracking will prefer Vivoactive 6; basic tracking needs are covered by Forerunner 165.

Data Integration & Analysis

• Vivoactive 6: Deeply integrates with Garmin Connect, producing detailed health reports and activity analysis charts.
• Forerunner 165: Syncs data to Garmin Connect but with simpler visualization and analysis.
• Who it matters for: Users who want comprehensive health and training insights gain more from Vivoactive 6; for basic data review, Forerunner 165 is sufficient.

Summary:

The Vivoactive 6 is more comprehensive and intelligent, catering to both daily health and training needs. The Forerunner 165 focuses on basic health monitoring, suitable for users seeking simplicity or primarily training-oriented tracking.

Sports & Training Focus - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

When comparing Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165 sports features, both watches serve different types of users depending on training goals and activity preferences.

Running-Focused Users

The Forerunner 165 is a more professional running training tool, offering:

• Garmin adaptive training plans and daily running recommendations
• Route creation and navigation
• Morning training reports
• Wrist-based running power monitoring
• VO2 Max estimation and race predictions
• Multi-constellation GNSS support (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo)

These features make it an excellent choice for runners seeking structured training and detailed performance insights. While it lacks training readiness scores, elevation/stamina metrics, or external power meter support, it still delivers a focused and efficient running experience for most users.

Casual Fitness & Multi-Sport Users

The Vivoactive 6 brings many 4Runner-style training tools into a lifestyle-focused smartwatch, including:

• Running dynamics, PacePro pacing guidance, running power, and race predictions
• Breadcrumb navigation for easier route tracking
• Support for over 80 sports modes, such as e-biking, trail running, motorsports, snorkeling, and surfing

Compared to the Forerunner 165, the Vivoactive 6 is more suited for general fitness enthusiasts and multi-sport users, while also offering daily health management and smartwatch features like sleep tracking and silent alarms.

Running Tracking Experience

Both watches provide reliable running tracking and clear navigation, but the key differences are:

• Forerunner 165: More like a dedicated training tool, with richer running metrics and daily workout insights for structured training plans
• Vivoactive 6: Focuses on a broader smartwatch experience with diverse sports modes; running training depth is slightly less, ideal for those who enjoy trying multiple activities

Summary Recommendation

• Focused on running and race training → Forerunner 165 is better
• All-around fitness and multi-sport tracking → Vivoactive 6 is better suited

Smart Features & Daily Use - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

When comparing Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165 smart features and daily use, the Vivoactive 6 clearly takes the lead:

• NFC support with Garmin Pay, making contactless payments easy
• 8GB built-in music storage, twice the capacity of Forerunner 165, allowing offline playback right out of the box
• Smart alarm: vibrates on your wrist during light sleep for a gentle wake-up, no subscription required
• Comprehensive health tracking: sleep tracking with morning report, nap detection, stress monitoring, blood oxygen, female health tracking, Body Battery index, and even walking workout suggestions

In contrast, the Forerunner 165 offers a more simplified smartwatch experience:

• Supports notifications, calendar, weather, and Garmin widgets
• Music requires an upgraded music version with limited storage
• No NFC payment support
• Garmin’s widgets interface remains smooth and customizable, providing a solid basic experience

Decision Summary:

• If you value music, payments, advanced health tracking, and smart alarms → Vivoactive 6
• If you only need basic notifications and activity info → Forerunner 165 is sufficient

Battery Life in Real Use - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

Both watches offer stable battery performance, with slight differences depending on usage:

Vivoactive 6

• Smartwatch mode: up to 11 days
• Always-on display: 5 days
• GPS mode: 21 hours
• GPS + Music mode: ~8 hours

Forerunner 165

• Smartwatch mode: up to 11 days
• GPS mode: ~9 hours
• GPS + Music mode: Music version ~6.5 hours

Practical Interpretation:

• For everyday use, battery differences are minor
• If you often listen to music while exercising or use GPS for long runs, Vivoactive 6 is more durable
• For most users, daily health and training tracking won’t be limited by battery life

Decision Summary:

• Prioritize daily use with music and GPS workouts → Vivoactive 6
• Basic daily use and standard GPS activities → Forerunner 165 is enough

Price & Value - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

• Slightly higher price, but offers music storage, NFC payments, and 80+ sports modes
• Best for users who want an all-in-one daily smartwatch and fitness companion
• If you mainly run or are on a tight budget, you might not fully use these extra features

Forerunner 165

• Lower price, focused on running training and basic health tracking
• Ideal for running enthusiasts or training-focused users
• Perfect for those who don’t need full smartwatch functionality and want to save money

Key Takeaway – Value Comparison:

• Looking for a versatile smartwatch with multi-sport features → Vivoactive 6
• Focused on running and basic tracking → Forerunner 165

Which One Should You Buy - Garmin Vivoactive 6 vs Forerunner 165

Choosing between the Garmin Vivoactive 6 and Forerunner 165 ultimately depends on your training habits, lifestyle, and what you value most in a smartwatch. Here’s a clear guide based on different user types:

• If you mainly run and train seriously → Forerunner 165

Its five-button layout, structured running metrics, adaptive training plans, VO2 max estimates, and GPS accuracy make it the ideal choice for runners who want a focused, performance-driven tool.

• If you want one watch for gym workouts, daily life, and multi-sport tracking → Vivoactive 6

With over 80 sports modes, music storage, Garmin Pay, smart alarms, and comprehensive health tracking, it’s perfect for users seeking a versatile smartwatch that blends fitness and lifestyle seamlessly.

• If you are new to Garmin → Vivoactive 6

The all-in-one functionality, intuitive interface, and broader smartwatch features make it easier for beginners to explore Garmin’s ecosystem without feeling overwhelmed.

Final Recommendation – Value & Usability:

• Focused, structured training and running metrics → Forerunner 165
• Daily wear, diverse sports, and lifestyle features → Vivoactive 6
• New to Garmin or unsure of long-term training needs → Vivoactive 6

No matter which watch you choose, both offer reliable AMOLED displays, accurate health tracking, and solid battery life. Your decision should hinge on whether your priority is training performance or everyday versatility.